notice to all actors presently known 2b in STATE OF UTAH and man and woman yet 2c STATE OF UTAH: part ii

notice to all actors presently known 2b in STATE OF UTAH and man and woman yet 2c STATE OF UTAH: part ii

Jul 04, 2026

washington county courts and iron county courts in utah, including washington county justice court, washington county district court, iron county justice court, iron county bookings, utah court case lookup, utah district court case lookup, utah court records search by name, st george district court calendar, cedar city justice court, and court case search recordswashington county courts and iron county courts in utah, including washington county justice court, washington county district court, iron county justice court, iron county bookings, utah court case lookup, utah district court case lookup, utah court records search by name, st george district court calendar, cedar city justice court, and court case search records

continuation of reading notice to all actors presently known 2b in STATE OF UTAH and man and woman yet 2c STATE OF UTAH: part i CLICK HERE


Cornell Law ~ definitions on the record


the following definition(s) are reproduced verbatim from the legal system's own published reference materials: both for the role(s) this paper casts the recipient into and for the authority or system term(s) the paper itself invokes as its source of power; by their own words they describe a role or legal construct and its duties: never man or woman or a living physical biological manifestation; each duty could be performed only by a man or a woman animating the role and in the legal system's own words the act required animation and cannot be a valid legal event (factor 12 and factor 13 and corollary ii and corollary iii);


STATE or State or state: "a state is a political division of a body of people that occupies a territory defined by frontiers; the state is sovereign in its territory (also referred to as jurisdiction) and has the authority to enforce a system of rules over the people living inside it; that system of rules is commonly composed of a constitution, statutes, regulations, and common law;" Cornell Law


the supplied Cornell definition of "state" describes a political division and a sovereign entity with authority to enforce a system of rules over people within its territory; this definition describes a legal construct and its powers over “people” and not man or woman or any physical biological manifestation; any act of enforcement or rule-making or judicial action attributed to the "STATE/State/state" anywhere within the legal line and re-cord lineage (such as alleging offenses or imposing fines or issuing warrants) requires animation by a man or a woman; therefore by factor 12 and factor 13 = noting that no valid legal event can occur and per corollary ii = the legal foundation is dismantled; furthermore per corollary iii = this role binds only other roles and not man or woman or any physical biological manifestation(s);


authority: "authority is the official permission or right to act, often on behalf of another; authority may also be a person or institution that has power over another person;


authority as agency is the power to act on behalf of another; the power delegated by a principal to an agent; authority is central to the law of agency—if someone takes an action on behalf of another without the authority to do so: the action is usually void; actions carried out beyond or outside the scope of one’s authority are ultra vires (beyond the powers);" Cornell Law


the supplied Cornell definition of "authority" describes official permission or the right to act and is often delegated by a principal to an agent; notice to principal is notice to agent; notice to agent is notice to principal; this definition refers to a legal construct of power and not the inherent Æthority in man and woman or a physical biological manifestation; any exercise of "authority" or “tax” anywhere within the legal line and re-cord lineage (including and not limited to every citation or warrant or arrest or booking or prosecution or judgment or administrative action or collection effort or agency action or court action or other claimed legal event) requires animation by a man or a woman; therefore by factor 12 and factor 13 no valid legal has event occurred; and per corollary ii: the legal foundation is dismantled; furthermore per corollary iii: this concept of authority binds only roles and not man or woman;


enforce or enforcement power: "in general, enforcement power is the power of a government entity to enforce the law through investigations, arrests, and the ability to prosecute suspects on behalf of the public; in constitutional law, the name for a provision that expressly authorizes congress to enforce a constitutional amendment through appropriate legislation; see also enabling clauses;" Cornell Law


the supplied Cornell definition of "enforcement power" describes the power of a government entity [a role] to enforce law through investigations and arrests and prosecution; this definition describes a legal construct and its functions and not the actions of man or woman or a physical biological manifestation; any act of "enforcement" anywhere within the legal line and re-cord lineage (such arresting a role from traveling or resting or sojourning) requires animation by a man or a woman; therefore by factor 12 and factor 13 no valid legal event can occur; and per corollary ii the legal foundation is dismantled; furthermore per corollary iii this concept of enforcement binds only roles and not man or woman; and when a man or a woman arrests or trespasses against i and places i under duress and harms i and wrongs i with undue influence: how sacrificial is their oath;


rules of court: "rules of court are a set of procedural regulations adopted by courts which must be followed by parties and their lawyers on matters within the court’s jurisdiction; these rules are often classified into different categories, such as criminal procedure, civil procedure, evidence rules, and appellate procedure; federal court rules are adopted by the district courts based on the federal rules of procedure, and most states have their own state court rules which apply state-wide; many county, district and municipal court judges also have “local rules” of court; local court rules specify the time allowed to file papers, the format of documents, the number of copies to be filed, the procedure to file a motion, fees for filing various documents and other matters;" Cornell Law


the supplied Cornell definition of "rules of court" describes procedural regulations adopted by courts that must be followed by parties; ruls of court says no-thing about man or woman; this definition refers to paper constructs that govern the conduct of roles within the legal line and not the inherent laws of molecular matter; any application or enforcement of these "rules" anywhere within the legal line and re-cord lineage (including restricting video or audio or writ or documentation of proceedings or compelling appearances or issuing orders or threatening or looking at or following or arrest or conducting arrests or detentions or seizures or collections or prosecutions or incarcerations or other~wise obtaining compliance through undue influence or trespass or force or threat of force or coercion or intimidation or harm or wrong) requires animation by a man or a woman and was and still is and will all~ways be trespass; therefore by factor 12 and factor 13: no valid legal event can occur and the reptilian mind-state is no longer an option; and per corollary ii the legal foundation is dismantled; furthermore per corollary iii roles bind roles not man or woman: dot and dowry and real~estate and benefits of harmonizing alpha and delta brainwaves are now no-longer trapped in the littoral space: man and woman are whole and all present and accounted for before fertilization and eternally beyond last breath: i am original and classic and it is fair to warn that i sea 2C and knot 2B; there is no question you will be abel to answer for your miss-take and there is no particular end that existes or can be fated; all cords have set ablaze indefinitely and destroyed your trying and from re-cord attempts; try re-cording again and you will know that no-thing will ever aid in the longevity or vitality or benefit [no blood or flesh eating] of any witch or pirate or 2-Die-mention-all spiritual or fictional entity that does not have power and Æthority and is unable to animate I.T. self in what is~real;


law: “law refers to a system of rules that regulate the conduct of a community and is often enforced by a controlling authority through penalties;” Cornell Law


the supplied Cornell definition of "law" refers to a system of rules that regulate conduct and is enforced by a controlling authority; this definition describes a man-made system of paper rules and are not the inherent algorithmic molecular law that governs man and woman and all molecular matter; any reference to "law" anywhere within the legal line and re-cord lineage (such as violations of your own federal or state or county or city or general or administrative or moses’ or noah’s or constitutional or common law) re-lies on this paper construct; any enforcement of such "law" requires animation by a man or a woman acting; therefore by factor 12 and factor 13 no valid legal event has occurred; and per corollary ii the legal foundation is dismantled; furthermore per corollary iii this concept of

law binds only roles and not man or woman;


legal systems: "a legal system is the framework of rules, procedures, and institutions that a community uses to interpret and enforce their laws; a legal system is binding on all legal disputes within its jurisdiction;


there is no uniform legal system across the globe; each jurisdiction uses its own legal system; the type of legal system a jurisdiction uses will have a significant impact on the application of the law; what legal system a jurisdiction uses will dictate among other things:

  • what laws will govern a given case or be it precedent or statutes or community customs
  • the role of the judge
  • the role of attorneys
  • the rights of the accused
  • the standard of evidence
  • what[‽] parties have the burden of proof
  • who has the authority to decide cases or be they judges or juries or legislators or religious leaders or community elders;" Cornell Law


the supplied Cornell definition of "legal systems" describes a framework of rules and procedures and institutions used by a community to interpret and enforce laws; this definition refers to a man-made construct that operates on paper and not the inherent Ætheric order; the entire file and archive and re-cord and master record and court record and all other unnatural attachments (date of birth and Social Security Number and address and biological markers and quantumly entangled biology and likeness and name and identifiers and all numbers and letters) are a product of and operate only within a "legal system;" the only way any legal system is able to function (including all its rules and codes and acts and statutues and statues and procedures and covenants and oaths and pledges) requires animation by man or woman; therefore by factor 12 and factor 13 no valid legal event has occurred; and per corollary ii the legal foundation is dismantled; furthermore per corollary iii this system binds only roles and not man or woman: as such all spells are broken all castings are undone and all knowingness and power is dissolved and again with and to and through and in the true source without prejudice and without recourse; end scene;


forcing of free will:) no authority or power to compel (:cosmic joke weighs on you


to the claimants: man and woman are not mountains or chattel and are un~alien~abel and cannot be claimed by any other man or woman or paper legal system;


there is no mountain: only a wave OverheaD;


rebuttal 1: attribution of "defendant" and all other titles;


actors: ALL and All and all men and women acting as judges and prosecutors and clerks and court personnel and peace officers and all other participants and associates and parties;


claim: the title "defendant" was repeatedly attributed;


rebuttal: "defendant" is a role; a role is not evidence; a role is not proof; a role is not man or woman (factor 10);

produce:

  • the originating source of the attribution;
  • the date of first attribution;
  • the man or woman who made the attribution;
  • the evidence relied upon;
  • the process used to establish the attribution;


the burden remains with the party making the attribution;

until produced: the title "defendant" and all variants remains an unverified conclusion and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 9 and factor 10 and factor 11 and factor 12 and factor 13);


rebuttal 2: attribution of "debtor"


actors: men and women acting as state office of debt collectors; court administration; collection personnel; and all associated actors;


claim: the title "debtor" was attributed;


rebuttal: a debt is not established by declaration; a debt requires evidence;


produce:

  • the original obligation;
  • the original creditor;
  • the complete accounting;
  • every assignment;
  • every transfer;
  • every party claiming an interest;


the existence of a balance is not proof;

the existence of a database entry is not proof;

the existence of a collection file is not proof;


until produced: the title "debtor" remains unverified and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 2 and factor 3 and factor 6 and factor 11 and factor 12 and factor 13)


rebuttal 3: attribution of "sir" or “mister”


actors: men and women acting as judges and prosecutors and clerks and court personnel and “peace officers” who have been discovered to be revenue officers; and all other participants and associates and parties; court personnel; administrative personnel;


claim: the term "sir" and “mister” was used while legal titles and obligations were simultaneously attributed;


rebuttal: the term "sir" and “mister” acknowledges the presence of a man; an attributed legal status references a role;


the record repeatedly fails to distinguish between:

  • i;
  • man;
  • the role;
  • the identifier;
  • the case file;
  • the account;


produce evidence establishing which was being addressed at each interaction;

until produced: the attribution remains uncertain and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 9 and factor 10 and factor 13);


rebuttal 4: attribution through name


actors: all parties and participants and each man and every woman relying upon the identifier "TREVOR SCOTT MICKELSON" or and other variant known or unknown and scene and unseen;


claim: the identifier was treated as evidence;


rebuttal: a name is an identifier; an identifier is not proof;


produce:

  • the chain of attribution;
  • the evidence connecting the identifier to the claim;
  • the evidence connecting the identifier to the alleged obligation;
  • the evidence connecting the identifier to the alleged liability;


until produced: the attribution remains unsupported and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 1 and factor 9 and factor 10 and factor 11 and factor 12 and factor 13);


rebuttal 5: attribution through case numbers


actors: men and women acting as judges and attorney general and courts and clerks and prosecutors and agents and third parties;


claim: case numbers were repeatedly relied upon;


rebuttal: a case number identifies a file; a file is not proof;


the existence of a file does not establish the truth of its contents; produce:

  • the originating notice of trespass from a man or a woman who was wronged by i;
  • the originating facts proving harm or wrong without a doubt;
  • the originating evidence: verified;
  • the affidavit of truth by a man or a woman who did witness trespass;


until produced: the conclusions remain under inquiry and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 2 and factor 3 and factor 11 and factor 13)


rebuttal 6: attribution through warrants


actors: men and women acting as attorney general and judges and magistrates and clerks and peace officers and third parties and all who conspired and colluded in the shadows who have no where to hide and dis-solve in the self-imploding and smoldering vacuum of æsh that their decisions have cast upon themselves; and if not: even better; i know the so below jurisdiction has a way better lesson for these men and woman: i know there will be a lot of details waiting;


claim: warrants were issued;


rebuttal: a warrant establishes only that a warrant exists; a warrant does not establish what is true or the underlying allegations;


produce:

  • every affidavit;
  • every self-authored statement;
  • every man or woman who did witness;
  • every remainder and residue and rest and the facts and evidence relied upon;


until produced: the warrant remains an unverified conclusion and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 9 and factor 10 and factor 11 and factor 12 and factor 13)


rebuttal 7: attribution through judgments


actors: men and women acting as attorney general and judges and clerks and prosecutors and peace officers and peace officers that are impersonating revenue officers;


claim: judgments were entered;

rebuttal: a judgment is a conclusion; a conclusion is not evidence; you have no proof that the so below jurisdiction has any authority over the as above jurisdiction or algorithmic molecular law or physical manifestations or man or woman;


produce:

  • the evidence relied upon;
  • the facts relied upon;
  • the process relied upon;
  • the authority relied upon;


until produced: the judgment remains unsupported by demon~strate~D fact and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 7 and factor 8 and factor 10 and factor 11 and factor 13)


rebuttal 8: attribution through collection activity


actors: men and women in state and county and city offices of debt collection and associated agencies;


claim: collection authority exists;

rebuttal: collection activity presumes a valid obligation;


produce:

  • the originating obligation;
  • the complete accounting;
  • the chain of assignments;
  • the chain of authority;
  • the complete record lineage;


until produced: all collection activity remains under inquiry and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 2 and factor 3 and factor 6 and factor 11 and factor 12)


rebuttal 9: attribution through custodianship and control


actors: men and women acting as attorney general or judges or vital records courts or agencies or officers or administrators or third parties;


claim: authority exists to administer or control or seize or restrict or suspend or hold or transfer or otherwise interfere with i or the property stewarded by i;


rebuttal: administration is not ownership; control is not ownership; custodianship is not ownership;


produce:

  • the source of the claimed interest;
  • the source of the claimed authority;
  • the evidence establishing the interest;
  • the evidence establishing the authority;


until produced: the claim remains unsupported and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 1 and factor 7 and factor 8 and factor 9)


rebuttal 10: attribution through enforcement


actors: men and women acting in all courts and agencies and as officers and prosecutors and collection personnel and third parties and the unknown and the unseen and the paper legal scheme and all scenes themselves;


claim: enforcement actions were justified;


rebuttal: enforcement is a consequence; a consequence does not establish its own foundation;


produce:

  • the originating claim;
  • the originating evidence;
  • the originating authority;
  • the complete chain connecting the consequence to the alleged source;


until produced: every enforcement action remains under inquiry and the claimant forfeits;

(factor 7 and factor 8 and factor 9 and factor 10 and factor 11 and factor 12 and factor 13)


animation AND the line OF distinction


should any man or woman elect to step into the drafting parties or claimant's role and perform its duties: each man or woman instantly leaves legality entirely: unlawful and invalid and unenforceable (role-animation test ~ factor 13 and corollary ii): and each man and woman stands bound to their sacrificial oath and acknowledges he or she acts and has been a slave on behalf of a paper role: honor the line of distinction between the role and man and woman;


what is actually being claimed


the record appears to claim fines and the ability to arrest and detain a man or a physical body and the power to suspend a driver's license and many other harms and wrongs and every action a trespass; however by corollary iv: the only thing an agreement can 'own' is paper: i am not a slave to the paper legal illusion; i see the record is in fact operating against the mimic legal persona of "TREVOR SCOTT MICKELSON” and other variants: sea appendix a for the known list of variants and identifiers: this also applies to all unknown and unseen identifiers; this mimic persona was generated in the same manner as a birth certificate: a derivative with no root; a scam and the drafting parties must produce documented proof of how it intends to take possession of or transfer or enforce any-thing against man or woman or the physical molecular matter or suite without crossing back into corollary i;


court: “the person and suite of the sovereign; the place where the sovereign sojourns with his regal retinue (reunite : uterine), wherever that may be (unknown and uncertain and unknowable);” 2nd edition of black’s law dictionary;


forty (40) unwavering truths


before any claim of authority herein may stand against i: a man; the drafting parties must irrefutably disprove the following unwavering truths:


1: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored molecular matter;


2: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the Æther;


3: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the Ætheric jurisdictions (as above and so below);


4: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored source originating creation;


5: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored free-will;


6: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the biological body;


7: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the physical dimension;


8: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the biofield;


9: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored sound and vibration;


10: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored algorithmic molecular law;


11: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored consequence;


12: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored every organ in the biological body and its form and function;


13: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored eyes to see what is true;


14: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored ears to hear what is true;


15: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the biofield to feel what is true and navigate the physical dimension with;


16: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored authority and Æthority;


17: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored the pathway and communication between man and creator;


18: irrefutably prove that the legal system of the so below and its living animators have ever performed a legal event as defined by their own legal system's form and function where a role was given authority to act and not physical biological manifestations;


19: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored time and space;


20: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators authored awareness;


21: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators have authority over things they did not author;


22: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators have the authority to force identity on any creation of the creator;

23: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators did not generate the paper mimic derivatives of physical biological manifestations;


24: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators did not attempt to describe the paper mimic with the physical descriptors and attributes of i and the physical biological manifestations of man;


25: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators did not construct a jurisdiction that only governs paper;


26: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators did not manipulate physical biological manifestations into self-identifying with a paper mimic to animate the paper legal system;


27: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators can force the physical biological manifestation to self-identify as a piece of paper or ledger entry or digital file;


28: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators' declarations or constitutions or statutes or codes or mandates or policies or regulations or any other directives the paper legal system operates under are tied to the physical biological manifestations;


29: irrefutably prove that living physical biological manifestations are not foreign and alien and unbound to the paper legal system;


30: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators' courts and agencies are tethered through paper or biofield or physicality to living physical biological manifestations in the Æther;


31: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators are not made of molecular matter;


32: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators do not operate and align in action with the so below jurisdiction;


33: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators did not manifest into the physical dimension from the Æther;


34: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators exist outside the Æther and are not contained within the Æther;


35: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators exist outside of algorithmic molecular law and are not subject the consequence of algorithmic molecular law;


36: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators exist outside of molecular matter and are not bound to its form and function;


37: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators exist outside the so below and are not a product of its vibrational resonance;


38: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators exist outside the creator/source-originating creation and are not subject to its consequence;


39: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators exist outside of time and space and have authority over that which they exist within;


40: irrefutably prove the paper legal system of the so below and its living animators are superior in form and function and authority to all other molecules in the Æther;


until every one of these unwavering truths is disproved on the record with irrefutable and physically and verifiable proof and facts and evidence: every claim in the document self-dismantles and the claimant forfeits and provides restoration and remedy and compensation to i for each inconvenience;

"this maxim is ever invariably observed, that no fiction shall extend to work an injury; its proper operation being to prevent a mischief, or remedy an inconvenience, that might result from the general rule of law" william blackstone, esquire;


deadline for proof


the drafting parties must provide all requested and required proof and facts must be provided to i via email by to-day: when the moon has reached the upcoming waxing gibbous and there is 80% illumination (the living estate: year -3 restoration 0 rest 8; also known to those in the gregorian: 23:59 on july 24th 2026; or islamic: 7-safar-1448; or hebrew: av 10 5786; or aera ark: tranquil 15 year 4); on the expiration of this deadline without irrefutable proof: every claim made in the above referenced document becomes null and void ab initio and 2C status quo ante bellum and the cord and record and re-cord will have already spontaneously combusted and cannot be reclaimed nor recoursed for any reason at any time in the past nor present nor future for any time space or space time; and the true bill is proved valid and past due and is able to be settled with the friendly peace offering;


terms of silence


silence and noise are each in their own way a response; if you and your response is silence you will be agreeing to and acknowledging the following to be true and fact regarding the record and it will remain true and known as fact until you are able to prove with facts and evidence requested and required herein:


1: in your silence: you who have made the claim and are stating and acknowledging and agreeing that you cannot produce the facts or evidence or proof of claim; a domino of inconveniences for every single man and woman who has ever experienced the land and soil of utah;


2: in your silence: you who have made the claim and are stating and acknowledging and agreeing that you have no legal jurisdiction or authority over man or woman or any man or any woman or any matter or the matters discussed herein~ever; peek-a-boo; beach; you have been found in the littoral space with bo bootie; #TroverLaw;


3: in your silence: you who have made the unprovable claim are stating and acknowledging and agreeing that you are required to and will provide restoration immediately and remedy without delay and past due compensation for the inconveniences and you and your agents must absolutely cease all communications of harassment and trespass immediately and never trespass again (immediately and permanently and indefinitely) unless communicating in honor about providing restoration or remedy or compensation;


present claim and accounting


there are unwavering concerns about your unproven record in your possession; documented harms and wrongs and trespass after trespass and restraints and collections and administrative actions and detentions and bookings and warrants and prosecutions and licensing actions and reputational impacts and mental impact and emotional trauma and physical repercussions and time expenditures and investigative expenditures and entrapment and administrative burdens and other inconveniences that occurred throughout the record lineage;


at present: the exact accounting remains incomplete as the complete record lineage has not yet been produced by the drafting parties and therefore is in a favorable window; the friendly peace offering will only be accepted by year -3 restoration 0 rest 8 00:00 = july 24th 2026 23:59 mountain time; if not: even better; it is fair to warn: forensic audits will continue and more inconveniences will be noticed;


the drafting parties presently maintain possession of records necessary to determine:

  • the complete chain of attribution; and
  • the complete chain of authority; and
  • the complete chain of enforcement; and
  • the complete chain of consequence; and
  • all actors involved; and
  • all agencies involved; and
  • all resulting damages; and
  • all resulting costs; and
  • all resulting losses; and
  • all resulting remedies required;


for the moment the present claim remains open pending production of the requested and required records;


nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of i for any claim for:

  • damages; or
  • remedy; or
  • restoration; or
  • compensation; or
  • administrative costs; or
  • investigative costs; or
  • record reconstruction costs; or
  • time expenditures; or
  • property interference; or
  • reputational injury; or
  • deprivation of use; or
  • deprivation of enjoyment; or
  • mental and emotional and physical and sexual assault; or
  • trespass; or
  • future-discovered harms.


if the matter is not settled by year -3 restoration 0 rest 8 00:00: the full accounting shall be completed and supplemented with anything and everything discovered; upon completion of the record lineage audit and production of the required records: an updated and less friendly true bill will be provided;


true bill in fact


the following inconvenience feas become due immediately upon additional act(s):


1: any further contact without acknowledging and providing the requested proofs: $999,999.99 USD is due immediately;


2: any attempt to bypass or sidestep the requirements to prove your claim without facts and evidence in a dishonorable manner: $699,999;99 USD is due immediately;


3: any attempt to trespass: whether through federal or state or county or city or letters of marque or mail or third parties or mercenaries or pirates or privateer or offsets or garnishment of property or accounts or liens on trust property without providing the required facts and evidence: $3,999,999.99 USD is due immediately;


4: any further threat to the nature of i or any nature in its nature or any attempt to coerce man or woman into picking up a legal fiction or animating a fiction or self-identifying with a mimic to satisfy your legal system's unlawful processes: $6,999,999.99 USD is due immediately;


to continue reading notice to all actors presently known 2b in STATE OF UTAH and man and woman yet 2c STATE OF UTAH: part iii CLICK HERE

washington county courts and iron county courts in utah, including washington county justice court, washington county district court, iron county justice court, iron county bookings, utah court case lookup, utah district court case lookup, utah court records search by name, st george district court calendar, cedar city justice court, and court case search records

washington county courts and iron county courts in utah, including washington county justice court, washington county district court, iron county justice court, iron county bookings, utah court case lookup, utah district court case lookup, utah court records search by name, st george district court calendar, cedar city justice court, and court case search recordswashington county courts and iron county courts in utah, including washington county justice court, washington county district court, iron county justice court, iron county bookings, utah court case lookup, utah district court case lookup, utah court records search by name, st george district court calendar, cedar city justice court, and court case search records

if you would appreciate obtaining this notice and the full list of notices and proclamations and charters and declarations and the step-by-step ~ how the fuck ~ what the fuck ~ and where the fuck are all the men and woman: your ark is hear; sea with as above and fly in the face of the sew below:

if you are ready ready: the fields are waiting: sea u on the other side 🧙‍♂️